The NSW Court of Criminal Appeal holds a key spot in New South Wales’ justice setup, standing as the top court for criminal cases. Folks who find themselves convicted or handed a sentence by the District or Supreme Courts find it essential to grasp the appeal steps to seek fairness and secure a just end.

This comprehensive guide aims to provide a detailed overview of the NSW Court of Criminal Appeal, its jurisdiction, and the various types of appeals it handles. By exploring the grounds for appeal, time limits, procedures, and possible outcomes, this article will equip lawyers and appellants with the knowledge necessary to navigate the complex world of criminal appeals effectively.

Understanding the NSW Court of Criminal Appeal

The NSW Court of Criminal Appeal (NSWCCA) is the highest court in NSW for criminal matters. It is a division of the Supreme Court of NSW and hears appeals from decisions made in the District Court or the Supreme Court.

The NSWCCA has jurisdiction to determine different types of appeals, including:

• Challenges to convictions involving questions of law
• Challenges to convictions involving questions of fact alone, or mixed questions of fact and law (provided leave is granted)
• Challenges to the severity or adequacy of sentences (provided leave is granted)

Appeals to the NSWCCA can be made in relation to persons who have been convicted following a trial in the District Court or Supreme Court. The Director of Public Prosecutions can also bring appeals in relation to sentences they consider manifestly inadequate.

Types of Appeals in the Court of Criminal Appeal

There are three main types of appeals that can be heard in the NSWCCA:

1. Conviction appeals: These involve challenging the finding of guilt made by a jury or judge. For an appeal based solely on a question of law, the appellant has a right to appeal. If the appeal involves questions of fact or mixed law and fact, leave to appeal must be granted by the NSWCCA.
   
2. Sentence appeals: An offender may appeal against the severity of the sentence imposed on them. The NSWCCA’s leave is required for a sentence appeal. Leave will be granted if the court considers that the sentence may be excessive or inadequate.
   
3. Crown appeals against sentence: The Director of Public Prosecutions can appeal a sentence on the basis that it is manifestly inadequate. These appeals can only be brought with the leave of the NSWCCA.

Understanding the different types of appeals is crucial for anyone considering challenging a District or Supreme Court decision. The grounds for each type of appeal and the requirement for leave in certain circumstances impact how a case may proceed in the NSWCCA.

Grounds for Appeal

The NSWCCA recognises several valid grounds for challenging court decisions. These grounds form the foundation for appealing either a conviction or sentence.

A conviction appeal may be based on legal errors that occurred during the trial. Common grounds include incorrect jury directions by the trial judge, mistakes in allowing or excluding evidence, or procedural unfairness that resulted in a miscarriage of justice.

Fresh evidence can support an appeal if it is credible and was unavailable during the original trial despite reasonable diligence in case preparation. The Court will consider whether this evidence could have created reasonable doubt in the jury’s mind about guilt.

Appeals against conviction may also argue that the guilty verdicts were unreasonable or cannot be supported by the evidence presented at trial. This requires showing that, based on the available evidence, it was not open to the jury to be satisfied of guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

Identifying Errors in Trial

Trial errors that may justify an appeal include mistakes in the judge’s directions to the jury about legal principles or evidence. For instance, if a judge failed to properly explain how certain evidence should be considered, this could form grounds for appeal.

The improper admission or exclusion of evidence during trial can constitute an appealable error. This includes situations where prejudicial evidence was wrongly allowed or where relevant defence evidence was incorrectly excluded.

Conduct issues during the trial may also support an appeal. This encompasses inappropriate behaviour by prosecutors, defence lawyers, or other aspects of trial management that compromise the fairness of proceedings.

Inconsistent verdicts between multiple charges may indicate error if the guilty and not guilty findings cannot be logically reconciled based on the evidence. The appeal court will examine whether the verdicts demonstrate an affront to logic and common sense.

Time Limits and Procedures for Filing an Appeal

Adhering to the strict time limits and procedural requirements for filing an appeal to the NSWCCA is crucial. Failure to meet these deadlines can result in losing the right to appeal. This section provides a step-by-step guide on the process and timelines for initiating an appeal.

Filing a Notice of Intention to Appeal

The first step in the appeal process is filing a Notice of Intention to Appeal. This document must be submitted within 28 days of the date of conviction or sentence in the District or Supreme Court. The 28-day time limit is strict, but the court may grant an extension if it is deemed to be in the interest of justice.

Once filed, the Notice of Intention to Appeal remains valid for 12 months. During this period, the appellant must take the next steps to proceed with the appeal, including:

• Filing a Notice of Appeal
• Preparing and submitting the grounds of appeal
• Providing written submissions in support of the appeal
• Obtaining a certificate confirming the availability of trial or sentence transcripts
• Identifying the legal representatives who will appear on behalf of the appellant

If the Notice of Appeal is not filed within the 12-month period, the Notice of Intention to Appeal will expire. Extensions to this time frame are possible, but the appellant must seek leave from the court.

Preparing and Submitting the Notice of Appeal

The Notice of Appeal is the formal document that outlines the specific grounds on which the appeal is based. It must be filed within 12 months of submitting the Notice of Intention to Appeal. If this deadline is missed, the appellant has the option to seek leave from the court to file the Notice of Appeal out of time.

When filing the Notice of Appeal, the appellant must also submit:

• The grounds of appeal
• Written submissions supporting the appeal arguments
• A certificate affirming the availability of relevant transcripts
• A statement identifying the legal representatives involved in the appeal

Preparing these documents requires careful consideration and legal expertise. The grounds of appeal must clearly identify the alleged errors in the original trial or sentence, and the written submissions should persuasively argue why the NSWCCA should overturn or vary the lower court’s decision.

The Appeal Hearing Process

The NSWCCA typically has three judges hear an appeal case. In matters involving significant legal issues, five judges may preside over the hearing.

Before the hearing begins, the judges review all appeal documents, including trial or sentence transcripts, relevant exhibits, and written submissions from both the prosecution and defence. These materials are organised into appeal books following strict court requirements.

During the hearing, both parties are represented by barristers who specialise in appellate work, with solicitors providing instruction. The barristers present oral submissions to expand on their written arguments. The judges actively engage with legal representatives, questioning them thoroughly about their positions and requiring detailed justification of legal arguments.

Role of Legal Representatives

Selecting experienced legal representation is vital for appeal hearings. Appellants need a team that thoroughly prepares and has specific expertise in NSWCCA matters. The legal team must:

• Prepare comprehensive written submissions outlining appeal grounds
• Organise appeal books according to court specifications
• Brief specialised appellate barristers
• Present compelling oral arguments during the hearing
• Respond effectively to judicial questioning

After hearing submissions, judges may deliver their decision immediately, though more commonly they reserve judgement for a later date. The court can uphold the original decision, overturn it, order a retrial, or modify the sentence based on their findings.

Costs Considerations in Appeals

Pursuing an appeal in the NSWCCA involves certain financial considerations. While the legal process can be costly, there are some unique aspects to costs in criminal appeals that are important to understand.

No Costs Orders Against Unsuccessful Appellants

One significant feature of appeals in the NSWCCA is that unsuccessful appellants generally do not face the risk of being ordered to pay the prosecution’s costs. This means that if you bring an appeal and it is dismissed, you will not be required to cover the legal expenses incurred by the other side.

This rule stands in contrast to many civil legal matters, where the losing party is often ordered to pay the successful party’s costs. The rationale behind this difference is that in criminal matters, the state is prosecuting the case, and it would be unjust to further penalise an appellant who has already faced the consequences of conviction and sentence.

However, it’s important to note that while you may not have to pay the other side’s costs if your appeal is unsuccessful, you will still be responsible for your own legal fees and expenses. This can include costs for your legal representation, obtaining transcripts and evidence, and any other disbursements related to the appeal process.

Potential Costs of Legal Representation

Engaging legal representation for an appeal in the NSWCCA can be a significant expense. Appeals are complex legal matters that require specialised knowledge and experience. As such, it is highly recommended to retain a criminal defence lawyer or barrister who has expertise in appellate work.

The costs of legal representation can vary widely depending on factors such as the complexity of the case, the length of the proceedings, and the seniority of the legal professionals involved. In some cases, legal aid may be available to assist with these expenses for those who meet eligibility criteria based on their financial circumstances.

It’s important to have a clear understanding of the potential costs involved in pursuing an appeal and to discuss these matters openly with your legal team. They can provide guidance on the estimated expenses and help you explore options for managing these costs.

Other Expenses Related to the Appeal Process

In addition to legal fees, there are other potential expenses associated with the appeal process. These can include:

• Obtaining transcripts of the original trial or sentencing proceedings
• Accessing exhibits and evidence from the lower court
• Preparing appeal books and other necessary documents
• Travel costs for attending court hearings

While some of these expenses may be covered by legal aid if you are eligible, it’s important to factor them into your overall consideration of the financial implications of pursuing an appeal.

Possible Outcomes of an Appeal

If an appeal is successful, the NSWCCA has the power to quash a conviction or sentence, depending on the nature of the appeal, and make further orders. Some potential outcomes include:

• Acquittal: The NSWCCA may quash the conviction and enter an acquittal, effectively finding the appellant not guilty of the offence.
• Retrial: The court may order a retrial, sending the case back to the lower court to be heard again from the beginning.
• Resentencing: For a successful sentence appeal, the NSWCCA can set aside the original sentence and impose a new, often more lenient, sentence.
• Remitting to lower court: The NSWCCA may send the case back to the original court with directions on how to proceed or what issues need to be addressed.

On the other hand, if an appeal is unsuccessful, the original conviction and/or sentence will stand. The NSWCCA may simply dismiss the appeal, affirming the lower court’s decision.

It’s important to note that the NSWCCA does not have the power to order costs against an unsuccessful appellant in criminal matters. This means there is no risk of having to pay the prosecution’s costs if you lose your appeal.

The specific outcome of any appeal will depend on the unique circumstances of the case, the grounds of appeal argued, and the NSWCCA’s assessment of the relevant law and evidence. 

Conclusion

The NSW Court of Criminal Appeal provides a vital avenue for reviewing and correcting potential errors in criminal cases from the District and Supreme Courts. Understanding the appeal process, from filing notices to presenting arguments before the court, is essential for those seeking justice through the appellate system.

The success of an appeal depends on multiple factors, including the strength of legal grounds, quality of submissions, and expertise of legal representation. While the process can be complex and time-sensitive, the Court of Criminal Appeal serves as a crucial safeguard in NSW’s criminal justice system, ensuring that convictions and sentences are properly scrutinised when challenged.

Get personalised legal advice—contact Daoud Legal today.

Frequently Asked Questions