Starting Bushfires in NSW Offence Guide

Key Takeaways

  • Intent and recklessness are key: Under section 203E of the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), intentionally causing a bushfire and being reckless about its spread can lead to 14 years’ imprisonment, with harsher penalties if the fire results in death.
  • Alternative charges apply: If intent cannot be proven, section 100(1) of the Rural Fires Act 1997 (NSW) allows for charges of lighting a fire without lawful authority, carrying up to 5 years’ imprisonment or fines.
  • Penalties escalate during fire bans: Offences committed during a total fire ban attract up to 7 years’ imprisonment or fines of $120,000, reflecting the heightened risk.
  • Defences include exemptions and necessity: Firefighters and those acting under their direction are exempt, while defences like duress, necessity, or accident may apply depending on the circumstances.

Free 1st Consultation

Jump to...

Introduction

I love a sunburnt country — but the intense heat, dryness, and abundance of bush in Australia makes bushfires a very real and catastrophic possibility. As such, bushfires have many laws and penalties surrounding them, aiming to protect our country and its people. Intentionally causing a bushfire in New South Wales is a serious criminal offence with significant legal consequences. This offence, defined broadly as arson, is outlined under section 203E of the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), involves deliberately igniting a fire and acting recklessly regarding its spread to vegetation on public or another’s land. Regarding bushfires, there are also more particular laws to be aware of. The repercussions of such actions can lead to severe penalties, including imprisonment, reflecting the gravity with which the law views such offences.

This guide provides essential information and practical guidance on the legal aspects of starting bushfires in NSW. It covers key elements such as the definition of the offence, the required proof for conviction, applicable penalties, and available defences. The guide is designed to offer clarity and insight for those facing charges, legal professionals, and the public seeking to understand this critical area of criminal law.

Understanding the Offence of Starting a Bushfire in NSW

Definition of Causing a Bushfire

Under section 203E of the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), a person commits an offence if they intentionally cause a fire and are reckless as to the spread of that fire to vegetation on public land or land belonging to another. This requires the prosecution to prove beyond reasonable doubt both the intention to start the fire and recklessness about its spread.

The offence carries a maximum penalty of 14 years imprisonment. Moreover, if the bushfire results in a death, the perpetrator may face charges of manslaughter or murder, which carry a maximum penalty of 25 years. Because the courts treat this offence very seriously, imprisonment is often the starting point in sentencing.

Firefighters and anyone acting under the direction of a firefighter during bushfire-fighting or hazard-reduction operations are exempt from this offence.

Actions Constituting a Bushfire

Causing a bushfire includes actions such as:

  • Lighting a fire
  • Maintaining a fire
  • Failing to contain a fire, except where the fire was lit by another person or was beyond the control of the person who lit it

These actions can lead to charges under section 203E of the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) or, alternatively, under section 100(1) of the Rural Fires Act 1997 (NSW). Under the Rural Fires Act, the maximum penalty is five years imprisonment or a fine of $11,000.

If the offence occurs during a total fire ban, penalties increase further—to up to seven years imprisonment or a fine of $120,000.

Proving the Offence Elements

Intent & Recklessness as the Required Elements

To secure a conviction for starting a bushfire in NSW, the prosecution must prove two critical elements beyond a reasonable doubt:

  • Intentional Act: The accused must have intentionally caused the fire, which includes lighting it, maintaining it or failing to contain it. For example, deliberately igniting a fire in a bush area meets this requirement.
  • Recklessness Regarding Spread: The accused must have been aware of the risk of the fire spreading to vegetation on public land or someone else’s property, yet chosen to ignore it. For instance, starting a fire in a dry, windy area without proper containment measures demonstrates recklessness.

Use of Alternate Verdict Options

If the prosecution cannot establish intent and recklessness, the jury may consider an alternative charge under section 100 of the Rural Fires Act 1997 (NSW). This option applies when the accused lit a fire without lawful authority, even if intent or recklessness cannot be proven.

Key differences include:

  • The primary offence under the Crimes Act requires proof of both intent and recklessness, carrying a maximum penalty of 14 years’ imprisonment.
  • The alternative under the Rural Fires Act focuses solely on the act of lighting a fire without authority and carries a maximum penalty of 5 years.

When applied, this fallback option ensures prosecutors can secure accountability for the illegal act of lighting a fire, even if higher thresholds aren’t met.

Understanding these elements is crucial for both prosecution and defence, as they determine the severity of charges and potential penalties.

Penalties for Bushfire Offences in NSW

Imprisonment Terms & Monetary Fines

In New South Wales, the penalties for bushfire offences are severe, reflecting the serious nature of the crime. Under section 203E of the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), a person found guilty of intentionally causing a bushfire and being reckless about its spread can face a maximum penalty of 14 years’ imprisonment. Additionally, if the offence results in death, the perpetrator may be charged with manslaughter or murder, carrying a maximum penalty of 25 years.

Monetary fines are also imposed to deter unlawful fire-setting. For example:

  • Under section 100(1) of the Rural Fires Act 1997 (NSW), setting or causing a fire without lawful authority can result in a fine of up to $11,000.
  • If the offence occurs during a total fire ban, penalties escalate significantly, with fines increasing to $120,000 and imprisonment terms extending up to 7 years.

Aggravated Charges When Death Occurs

When a bushfire offence causes the death of another person, charges can be elevated to manslaughter or murder, each carrying significantly harsher penalties—up to 25 years’ imprisonment. The prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the accused’s actions were reckless and directly led to the loss of life. These aggravated charges underscore the severe legal consequences of such offences, particularly when they result in loss of life.

Provisions & Penalties Under the Rural Fires Act 1997 (NSW)

Offence of Causing a Fire without Lawful Authority

Under section 100(1) of the Rural Fires Act 1997 (NSW), setting or causing a fire without lawful authority is a serious offence. This includes:

  • Lighting a fire on someone else’s land
  • Lighting a fire on public land
  • Allowing a fire to escape from your property and cause damage

The penalties for this offence can be severe, including up to 5 years imprisonment or a fine of $11,000.

This provision serves as an alternative charge if the primary offence under the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) cannot be proven, thereby providing prosecutors with another avenue to hold individuals accountable for illegal fire-related activities.

Penalty Enhancements During Total Fire Bans

During a total fire ban, the penalties for fire-related offences are significantly increased. If someone is found guilty of starting a fire during a total fire ban, they face much harsher consequences:

  • Up to 7 years imprisonment
  • A fine of up to $120,000

These enhanced penalties reflect the heightened risk and potential consequences of fires during such conditions. Additionally, they aim to deter reckless behaviour and emphasise the importance of adhering to fire restrictions during high-risk periods.

Defences Available for Bushfire Offences

Firefighter Exemption & Operational Defence

Individuals who are firefighters, or those acting under the direction of a firefighter during bushfire fighting or hazard reduction operations, are typically exempt from bushfire offence charges. This protection is explicitly provided by:

  • Section 203E of the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW)
  • Section 100 of the Rural Fires Act 1997 (NSW)

As a result, these professionals are not held liable for actions taken in the course of their duties, since their work is critical to public safety and effective fire management.

Other Defences Including Duress & Accident

Depending on the circumstances, several additional defences may be available to those charged with bushfire offences. Common examples include:

  • Duress: Arguing that the accused was compelled to start a fire under a direct threat of death or serious harm.
  • Necessity: Contending that the fire was started to prevent greater harm, such as destroying a small fire to stop a larger, more dangerous blaze.
  • Accident: Demonstrating that the fire was unintentional—for instance, if it resulted from an unforeseen equipment malfunction.

It is crucial for anyone facing bushfire offence charges to seek advice from an experienced criminal defence lawyer, who can help determine the most appropriate defence strategy and ensure the accused’s rights are protected throughout the legal process.

Conclusion

Intentionally causing a bushfire in New South Wales is a serious criminal offence with significant legal consequences. This guide has covered essential aspects of the offence, including its legal definition under section 203E of the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), the required elements of intent and recklessness, and the severe penalties that can result, including up to 14 years imprisonment. Additionally, it has explored the provisions under the Rural Fires Act 1997 (NSW), the importance of understanding defences such as firefighter exemptions, and the potential for alternative verdicts if primary elements cannot be proven.

If you or someone you know is facing charges related to starting a bushfire, it is crucial to seek immediate legal advice from experienced criminal defence lawyers. Contact Daoud Legal, a trusted criminal law firm in Sydney, to discuss your case and explore your legal options. Their expertise in handling such serious offences can provide you with the guidance and support needed to navigate the complexities of the legal system and ensure the best possible outcome for your case.

Frequently Asked Questions

Table of Contents

ONLINE ENQUIRY

Arrested or Charged?

David Philippe of Daoud Legal: Sydney Criminal Defence & Traffic Lawyers
Heath Joukhader of Daoud Legal: Sydney Criminal Defence & Traffic Lawyers
Robert Daoud of Daoud Legal: Sydney Criminal Defence & Traffic Lawyers

Lawyers Available 24/7

What Our Clients Say

Why Choose Daoud Legal: Sydney Criminal Defence & Traffic Lawyers

A Winning Record

With a 99% success rate, we have a history of winning cases. We focus on having charges dropped, securing 'not guilty' verdicts, and saving our clients' licences.

Expert Criminal & Traffic Law Specialists

Our senior lawyers have over 40 years of combined experience in NSW criminal & traffic law. Their deep knowledge and courtroom skills give you a significant advantage.

Free Strategy Session & 24/7 Help

We offer a free initial Strategy Session to assess your case and outline your options. Our team is available 24/7 because immediate legal advice is crucial.

97%

Penalty Reduction Achieved

98%

Client Satisfaction Rate

Arrested or Charged?

David Philippe of Daoud Legal: Sydney Criminal Defence & Traffic Lawyers
Heath Joukhader of Daoud Legal: Sydney Criminal Defence & Traffic Lawyers
Robert Daoud of Daoud Legal: Sydney Criminal Defence & Traffic Lawyers

Lawyers Available 24/7

Talk To A Lawyer Now